Image courtesy of www.mytinyphone.com
Wow. That might be the only word to describe the NHL Conference Quarterfinals. Sure some series weren't a total surprise; Chicago took care of Minnesota with relative ease. But Oh My Gretzky, the rest of the series made for an exciting first round.
The Pens struggled to get by the Islanders until they
awarded Tomas Vokoun the starting job and pulled the struggling Marc-Andre
Fleury. The Bruins needed a miracle to get by the Leafs in seven games, the
Senators and Red Wings upset the Canadians and Ducks, respectively and the
Canucks dropped to 2-12 in their last 14 playoff games after a sweep at the
hands of the Sharks.
So, now what? As usual, the second slate is somewhat
unexpected but provides some chance we’ll be treated to a matchup of
heavyweights in the Stanley Cup.
(1)Chicago
vs. (7) Detroit
Why
Detroit should win: The Red Wings toppled the Ducks with solid
goaltending from Howard and timely goals from a litany of experienced veterans.
After a ho-hum regular season, first-year captain Henrik Zetterberg stepped up
his play with eight points in the series. While the team lacks a great scorer,
there are a handful of solid scoring options making the offense harder to stop.
Plus, Johan Franzen has yet to unleash his annual playoff fury.
Why
Chicago should win: They’re not just better than the Wings, they’re
nearly perfect. They have elite scoring talent (Kane, Sharp, Hossa, Toews), a
stingy defense led by Duncan Keith and Brent Seabrook and Dominik Ha- er um, I mean Corey Crawford in
net with the re-animation of Ray Emery’s corpse backing him up.
Verdict:
The
Wings ended the season on a four-game win streak before upsetting the Ducks.
They’re playing with confidence and appear to be dangerous. But only dangerous
enough to give the superior Hawks a slight scare. Chicago in six.
(5) Los Angeles vs. (6) San Jose
Why San
Jose should win: The Sharks steamrolled the Canucks in four
games in the first round. Goalie Antti Niemi has been a brick wall all season
and appears to be good enough to match Quick in a seven-game series. The Sharks
struggled to find secondary scoring for much of the season and rely heavily on
the trio of Logan Coture, Joe Pavelski and Pat Marleau (As an aside, Joe
Thornton scored seven goals this year. That’s why he wasn’t included.) .
Why Los
Angeles should win: Much like the Sharks, the Kings enter the second
round having won four games in a row. Also like the Sharks, the Kings most
dangerous weapon is their goalie. Quick allowed only 10 goals in the first
round tilt against the Blues. However, the Kings have the edge and scoring
range the Sharks lack. Dustin Brown, Dustin Penner, Mike Richards, Anze
Kopitar, Jeff Carter, Justin Williams and Drew Doughty are all capable of
chipping in while Brown, Dwight King and Jordan Nolan create a physical
environment which throws finesse-first teams like the Sharks off their game.
Verdict:
The
Kings are rolling much like they were last season. This team knows how the win
in the playoffs and can impose their will on nearly anyone they play. The trick
will be getting by the red-hot Niemi. He’s playing well enough to win two for
the Sharks. Los
Angeles in six.
Why
Ottawa should win: The Senators rolled the over-achieving Canadians
in five games. It’s amazing what getting back a hot goaltender and the league’s
best defenseman can do for a team. They have just the right mix of experience
(Alfreddson, Gonchar) and youth (Conacher, Turris) to compete with anyone. Oh,
and they have Erik freakin Karlsson back.
Why
Pittsburgh should win: They have the most talented and
offense-heavy roster in the NHL by a mile. They’re sloppy at times but that
barely matters when Crosby and Co. can score at ease. Plus they can pair Pascal
Dupuis and Chris Kunitz with Crosby on the first line and be fine because he
makes everyone better. Coach Dan
Bylsma solved his biggest problem by swapping out Fleury for Vokoun, now it
appears they’ll be tough for anyone to beat. (And anyone who thinks Fleury
deserves another shot this post-season is insane. The Penguins were nearly
upset for the fourth post-season in a row because of his incompetence.)
Verdict:
The
Penguins didn’t get pushed to six by the Islanders just because of Fleury’s
incompetence or weird hockey nuances. The Islanders outplayed them at times,
outshot them in games, took advantage of huge defensive lapses and controlled the
puck far more than the Penguins did. There are some legitimate concerns here
especially considering how good Ottawa looked last round. But, it doesn’t appear the Senators have the
scoring talent to keep up with the Pens. Unless Anderson completely stands on
his head, this series is Pittsburgh’s. Looks for the Pens to make it as
difficult as possible. Pittsburgh in seven.
(4)
Boston vs. (6) New York Rangers
Why New
York should win: Henrik Lundquist. The Ranger backstop posted
back-to-back shutouts to eliminate the Capitals in the first round. Although
big-time acquisitions Brad Richards and Rick Nash haven’t impressed so far but
a team full of solid veterans and reliable hockey guys (Callahan/Stepan) has
picked up the slack. These guys haven’t given coach Torts much of a reason to
verbally abuse reporters of late (not that it’s stopped him).
Why
Boston should win: Nothing says resilient, veteran team quite like
scoring three goals in the final 11 minutes of a game seven to force overtime. The
Bruins are always a chore to play as they’re aggressive, physical and occasionally dirty. They play
solid D, hit, score when necessary, hit, have a solid goaltender in Rask and
hit. One thing they’ll never do is concede a victory without a fight. The Bruins are tough but lately they’ve
struggled to score (three goals in nearly a nine-period stretch in games 5-7).
Verdict:
These
teams are similar in many ways. Expect a series full of solid goaltending,
plenty of hitting , timely goals, a few fights, a vintage Tortorella press
conference and low scores. The slight edge goes to New York because of
Lundquist’s capabilities. Rangers in seven.
Stay hungry, my friends.
No comments:
Post a Comment